Archive for the ‘Newsletters’ Category

Why you should use a Migration Agent

Applying for a Visa can be a daunting and anxiety provoking task. Applying for some visas can be relatively straight forward, such as a holiday visa however other visa applications can be incredibly complicated and require an in-depth knowledge of the specific countries laws and visa processes.

 Save time and money

By working with an experienced Migration Agent you can save time and money by avoiding making mistakes and getting an outcome faster.

Sometimes small things can have a huge impact on your visa outcome. If you are submitting an application for a visa by yourself or making your application with reference to what you have read or by what a friend did in their case, the chances are you will make a mistake. And some mistakes can have terrible consequences, such as a refusal or a considerably lengthy delay.

Australia has its own legislations and policy in immigration.  The legislations and policy determine the complexity and depth of information required to ascertain if an applicant reaches the minimum set of requirements and if the visa applied can be ultimately granted.

As you can imagine it is not the intention of any immigration department to make a visa application complex or difficult, although it may feel like it at times.

However, form filling is only one aspect of the visa application process, if you don’t meet the requirements set by the visa you wish to apply for, you may be just filling in visa applications with no chance of obtaining a visa.

Avoid mistakes and traps

By working with a Migration Agent you avoid mistakes and your visa will hopefully be approved faster, since we know what documents will streamline your result. Naturally if you provide the Department of Immigration and Border Protection with all the forms and supporting documents required, (it is often called a decision-ready application), your application will be processed faster without any unnecessary delay.

The problem can be that even a small error in terminology or incorrect interpretation can have a significant effect on the validity of a visa application, remember it is not the job of the Department of Immigration to check and assist a visa applicant in their visa

application. One error, however small, could leave you with an invalid application (which will be simply returned to you as it will not be even considered by the Department of Immigration) or the visa being refused.

It is important to remember that the Department of Immigration do change their immigration laws and requirements when they see fit, which can mean that you may meet the requirements for a successful visa application on one day and not be eligible for the same visa the next.

Receive objective assessment

 An applicant cannot always be expected to have the knowledge of particular migration laws, policy or visa processes and requirements.

Individual circumstances such as education, age, health, family, criminal record and more are usually taken into consideration by the Department of Immigration and Border Protection particularly with permanent resident visas.

By consulting an expert you will receive a clear and objective visa assessment result, a visa strategy that has been tested and is straightforward, and clear instructions about what documents are needed. If you send us the material we can prepare your application and lodge it for you, so you would not have any hassles.

Skill and Strategies

By using an experienced Migration Agent, you will have access to in-depth knowledge and strategies based on the experience and skill that only Migration Agents have, due to years of experience working with visa applications as well as having access to legislation databases that the general public doesn’t have.

A skilled Migration Agent is able to assist you and guide you through the various different types of visas that may suit your circumstances and provided you with up to date information on immigration requirements and laws.

In addition to providing you with up to date information on the visa requirements, Migration Agents can complete the required paper work on your behalf and often lodge the application for you which can shorten the time before obtaining your visa.

If your circumstances mean that you are unable to obtain the visa you want, a Migration Agent can provide you with other avenues or bridging visa options that you may wish to consider allowing you to obtain the visa you originally wanted at a later date.

Fees are usually determined based on the type of visa and the depth of services required for such assistance.

 Conclusion

All Migration Agents operating in Australia must be registered with the Migration Agents Registration Authority (MARA), are required to have a sound knowledge of migration law and procedure and must abide by a very strict code of conduct when dealing with their clients and with the Department of Immigration and Border Protection.

To be registered, an agent has to demonstrate that they have deep knowledge of the laws and regulations of Australian Immigration by successfully completing a PostGraduation course in Immigration Law.

If you need more information or if you need assistance or advice on how to proceed please call us on on 07 3281 6644 or email mail@powerlegal.com.au.

What to do after a family separation and pending divorce

Do you have a friend or relative who has just separated?  If so, the information below should help.

 What is meant by separation?

Separation in Family Law is defined as the bringing to an end of a marriage or de facto relationship (which also includes same sex couples). There is no need or ability to register a separation under Australian Family Law. Separation is a fact which must be proven if it is disputed by the other party at a later time.

In the case of a divorce, the date of separation is recorded on the Application for Divorce and is sworn or affirmed to be true and correct by the Applicant. If you cannot prove you had separated from your spouse at least 12 months before you file your Application for Divorce, the Court will not grant your divorce.

Therefore, it is a good idea to confirm the separation in writing, even if this is via text message that can be saved, at or shortly after the time of separation. Often divorce cases and cases for property settlement in de facto relationships can turn upon whether or not a party can prove that separation occurred on a particular date.

 What about de facto relationships?

In the case of a de facto relationship, particularly where the relationship ends on or about the two year anniversary, whether or not a property settlement is available can depend on whether the separation took place before or after the two year anniversary. If the de facto relationship was less than two years long the Court may have no jurisdiction under the Family Court Act to provide a property settlement. There may be alternate remedies available or another basis other than the two year requirement to show that a de facto relationship existed.

In addition, there is also a two year limitation period in which to commence the Application, from the time of separation. In such cases, again, the date of separation can be significant.

 What about if you still live together?

Separation can take place even though the parties live under the one roof and it can also be a gradual process. In these cases, the Court will need to examine a number of factors to determine when and if a separation has taken place.

Those factors can include whether the parties:

  • Slept in separate rooms or together after the alleged date of separation;
  • Performed domestic duties such as cooking and washing for each other after the alleged date of separation;
  • Separated their financial affairs to any extent after the date of separation;
  • Lodged or signed any documents informing government agencies of the separation, such as Applications for Centrelink or ATO documents as a single person, as opposed to a person in a relationship;
  • Continued to be intimate after the date of alleged separation; and
  • Made it publicly known (such as by telling friends and family), that they had separated.

Ten things to consider if a person has just separated:

  •  Contact your bank or financial institution in writing (by fax or email- with your signature appearing) to stop joint funds being removed or liabilities increased.
  • If you have a Power of Attorney, ensure it is revoked, and have a new one drafted.
  • Consider whether your nominated death beneficiary for your superannuation entitlements is appropriate.
  • Photocopy all of your and your ex’s financial documents and put them in a secure location (this should not be your home or motor vehicle).
  • Look at your Will and consider if it is still what is appropriate and if you do not have a Will have one drafted.
  • If you have children, contact the Child Support Agency and find out how much is to be paid or is payable.
  • Do title searches on your properties. If your home is not in your name or is in joint names ensure you place caveats over the properties. If your property is held as a joint tenant, ensure you sever the joint tenancy.
  • If there has been family violence in the relationship you may need to seek a Restraining Order.
  • Start a diary which keeps track of time your partner has with the children and any adverse behaviour he/she displays.
  • Seek advice from an experienced Family Lawyer.

If you need more information, or if someone you know needs help, get them to call us to speak to one of our solicitors on a no obligation basis on (07) 3281 6644 or email mail@powerlegal.com.au.

Wills for blended families

Making a Will is important, particularly if you are part of a blended family. A blended family is a family in which one or both partners have a child or children from a previous relationship. Careful estate planning now should ensure that all of your intended beneficiaries are provided for when you die and that the potential for conflict within the family unit is minimised.

There is no one-fit solution when it comes to estate planning for the blended family. The dynamics and needs within families evolve and personal assets may fluctuate from year to year. However, by identifying the potential issues that might arise within each family unit, and considering some options to address these, an effective estate plan can be accomplished.

The important thing is to discuss your circumstances and objectives with your legal advisor so that your wishes can be properly set out in your Will and other estate planning documents. These documents should be reviewed regularly to take account of changing circumstances.

Competing interests – the common issue

The most typical issues faced by a Will-maker within a blended family are the competing interests of past and present partners, biological children and step-children. The Will-maker is likely to want to look after the current partner and also children from previous relationships. There may also be children of the present relationship and children from the partner’s prior relationship to consider.

Traditionally, a Will for a married couple provides for the estate to go to the surviving partner in the first instance and then upon their death, to the children. This is likely to be inappropriate for blended families – not only must the children of the deceased wait until the step-parent dies before inheriting, but there is a risk that the surviving partner may change their Will so that the deceased’s own children miss out. A further risk is that the assets may over time diminish, leaving little for the deceased’s children.

In some instances, if adequate provision is not made from a deceased estate, an eligible beneficiary may be able to make a family provision claim causing distress, delay and uncertainty during an already stressful time.

The following may provide some helpful suggestions when considering these complex issues.

Immediate gifts and interests in real estate

When making your Will, you may choose to provide an immediate gift to your children upon your death rather than your children waiting to inherit after the death of your partner. A life insurance policy nominating the children as beneficiaries might be appropriate in this instance.

If the estate is significant, the Will could provide for an immediate gift of real estate, money or other valuable asset to the children. This will safeguard against the possibility of your children missing out on an inheritance should your partner later change their Will or your estate assets diminish.

If you and your partner hold real estate as joint tenants, you might consider changing this to a tenancy in common. A joint tenancy means that the share of property held by a deceased tenant automatically goes to the surviving tenant. This cannot be altered by Will. However, if the property is held as tenants in common, your share may be left to your children subject to leaving your partner a life interest in that share of the property.

A life interest will provide your partner a continued right to reside in and use the property until he/she dies at which stage your share will revert to your children. Note however, that life interests can be complex due to circumstances such as health and aging of the surviving partner who may need to downsize or move to an aged care facility. These issues should be carefully considered and discussed with your legal advisor.

Testamentary trust

A testamentary trust is a trust contained in a Will that comes into effect upon the testator’s death. A testamentary trust provides flexibility and control in asset distribution amongst beneficiaries and assists in protecting your assets from third parties and creditors. Assets can be preserved so that they can pass through future generations and the trust can provide for different scenarios.

Testamentary trusts are generally tax effective and may be worthwhile considering in your estate planning if the value of your likely assets warrants the establishment and administrative costs.

Choosing your executor

Your executor is your personal legal representative when you die. He or she has the role of ensuring that the wishes set out in your Will are followed. Your executor will deal with your estate lawyers, accountants, financial advisors and real estate agents. He or she will maintain estate accounts, pay bills and generally oversee the administration of your estate.

Generally, a person’s spouse or child will be nominated for this role. However, because of the dynamics involved in blended families it may be preferable to appoint one or more neutral friends or professionals so that the role may be carried out with impartiality.

Conclusion

These are some important points worth remember when considering estate planning for the blended family:

  • Talk to your partner about your estate planning objectives.
  • List all assets including those held separately and jointly.
  • Consider everybody from the family including spouses, previous spouses, biological and step-children, and identify those whom you wish to benefit – preparing a family tree may be helpful.
  • Contemplate if your choice of beneficiaries might leave open the potential for a family provision claim. You may need to discuss this with your legal advisor.
  • Choose impartial executors.
  • Discuss your objectives with your lawyer so the relevant documents can be prepared.
  • Ensure that you have binding death benefit nominations in place for your superannuation and life insurance policies.
  • Review your Will and plans regularly, and immediately if your personal, health or financial circumstances significantly change.

If you or someone you know wants more information or needs help or advice, please contact us on 07 3281 6644 or email mail@powerlegal.com.au

What it means now 457 visas have been axed

The Temporary Work (Skilled) Visa program (457 visa) commenced in 1996 with the objective of addressing genuine skill shortages in the Australian labour market. Employers (known as business sponsors) could recruit overseas workers for skilled positions for which they could find no suitable local candidates

The 457 visa allowed migrants to work in Australia for four years and for many, provided a pathway for permanent residency. Visa holders could also apply to bring family members to Australia on a 457 secondary visa.

In April 2017, the Government announced that the 457 visa will be abolished and replaced with a completely new skilled migration scheme. Changes will be implemented in stages with a new Temporary Skill Shortage (TSS) visa anticipated to be fully operational, and the 457 visa obsolete, by March 2018.

The reforms are expected to improve the integrity of Australia’s skilled migration program which has previously been subject to exploitation, and to increase the supply of Australian skilled labour by encouraging employers to invest in local training and development.

Visa applicants will face more stringent processes for securing a visa and businesses will have fewer alternatives and higher requirements for sourcing skilled labour from overseas. Several occupations have been removed from the eligible categories list and higher thresholds must be met for the grant of a visa.

This article explains the implications of the reforms to employers and visa holders.

The new TSS visa – what it means for visa applicants and employers

The TSS visa will comprise a short-term and medium-term stream.

The short-term stream will permit employers to fill temporary skills gaps identified from a list of occupations on the Short-Term Skilled Occupations List (STSOL) for two years.

The medium-term stream targets long-term skills gaps and is designed to fill more narrowly-defined and highly-skilled occupation categories appearing on the Long-Term Strategic Skills List (MLTSSL). This visa will last for four years.

Less occupations available for visa grants

The STSOL and MLTSSL replace the previous listings of eligible occupations for skilled migration, reducing the number of categories from 651 to 435. Of these, 268 will be available for the short-term (two year) visa and 167 for the long-term (four year) visa.

Amongst the most commonly-used occupations to be removed are human resource advisors, production managers in the manufacturing industry, sales representatives (industrial products), IT professionals (web developers) and training and development professionals. Other occupations and industries affected include accommodation and food services, biochemistry, performance and arts, legal workers and migration agents.

Shorter visa stays and less opportunity for permanent residency

The grant of a 457 visa enabled the holder to remain in Australia for up to four years and, if eligible, to apply for permanent residency after two years. The reforms have had a significant impact upon this.

The maximum duration for the short-term TSS visa will be two years with a once-only onshore renewal capacity. The visa will not provide an opportunity for permanent residency.

The maximum duration for the medium-term TSS visa will be four years with an onshore renewal capacity. The medium-term TSS visa will provide a pathway for permanent residency however visa holders will need to wait for three years before applying (as opposed to the two-year wait under the 457 visa).

Essentially, there will be fewer occupations and opportunities enabling work-related migration to, and permanent residency in, Australia.

More stringent processes for visa applicants

Short-term and medium-term visa applicants will need to demonstrate at least two years’ relevant work experience in their chosen occupation category. This was not previously necessary under the 457 program.

The minimum age limit for a temporary work visa under the previous system was 50 years – this has been reduced to 45 years.

Official criminal clearances will be mandatory for both categories as opposed to the self-declaration system used previously.

Higher standards of English proficiency will apply – applicants for a short-term visa will need a minimum EILTS (or equivalent) score of 5 with a minimum of 4.5 in each test component and applicants for a medium-term visa will require a minimum of IELTS 5 (or equivalent test) in each component. The exemption for certain applicants to meet the English language requirement (currently those whose salary is over $96,400) will be removed.

Visa holders will need to provide Tax File Numbers to the Department of Immigration and Border Protection for cross-checking with the Australian Taxation Office to ensure conformity with salary requirements

More stringent processes for businesses

Businesses must pay visa holders a market salary rate and meet the Temporary Skilled Migration Income Threshold (TSMIT) to ensure that overseas workers are not exploited and Australian workers cut out of a position.

Non-discriminatory workforce testing will also apply, designed to ensure businesses are not actively discriminating against Australian workers. Labour market testing will continue to apply in most cases.

Business sponsors will be required to contribute to a Skilling Australians Fund at the time of nominating a visa applicant. The fee will be $1,200 per year or part year for small business (with a turnover of less than $10 million) and $1,800 per year or part year for all other businesses.

The application fees for TSS visas will be higher than the 457 visa which was last set at $1,060. The fee for the short-term visa will be $1,150 and for the medium-term visa $2,400.

Business sponsors who fail to meet their obligations under the skilled migration visa scheme will be made public.

What about current 457 visa holders and applicants?

The reforms will not affect current 457 visa holders with existing conditions remaining intact.

Applicants for 457 visas who lodged an application on or before 18 April 2017, for an occupation that has been removed from the previous eligible categories, and the sponsoring business for the applicant, may be eligible for a refund of fees.

Conclusion

The reforms narrow the range of occupations available for overseas workers to apply for a visa and restrict businesses to fewer opportunities to recruit from overseas. The deletion of several occupations is considered more suited to Australia’s skills shortage and the overall changes necessary to protect Australian workers, discourage exploitation and encourage more investment in training and development.

The visa process is notoriously complex and the reforms have significant impact upon visa applicants and employers.

If you think you will be affected by the new reforms, or you know somebody who wants more information or needs help or advice, please contact us on 07 3281 6644 or email mail@powerlegal.com.au

Protection from Domestic Violence

Protection from Domestic Violence

There has been an upswing in media reportage of domestic violence. With domestic violence campaigner Rosie Batty as the 2015 Australian of the year, domestic violence has never been so topical or newsworthy.

The media seems to mostly shine its light on the physical side of domestic violence – the murders, the beatings, the actions that physical scars and bruising. This physical violence, while tragic, is not the only type of domestic violence experienced by Australians.

Statistics

A snapshot of domestic violence in Australia from the Domestic Violence Prevention Centre provides the following statistics:

  • Just under half a million women reported that they experienced physical or sexual violence in the last 12 months.
  • 8% of these women said the perpetrator was a current or ex-partner.
  • 4% said that the perpetrator was a male family member or friend.
  • 7% of men who had experienced physical or sexual violence in the last 12 months had had the violence perpetrated by other men.

What constitutes domestic violence?

The Australian Parliament has defined the following as being examples of domestic violence:

  • Emotional abuse, including attacks on the victim’s self-esteem, undermining, and unjust blaming of the victim for all the problems that are experienced in the relationship;
  • Verbal abuse, including swearing and yelling in public and private;
  • Social abuse, such as isolating the victim from friends, family and the community;
  • Economic abuse, including not allowing the victim to make or keep their own money, leaving them reliant on the abuser;
  • Psychological abuse, such as making threats about the safety of children, dangerous driving, terrorising in order to scare the victim and keep them compliant;
  • Spiritual abuse, which can involve denying the victim access to their own religion or using religious beliefs as an excuse to abuse the victim;
  • Physical abuse, including food and sleep deprivation, using physical violence, locking the victim out of the house or hurting child victim/s to control the adult victim; and
  • Sexual abuse, including rape, coercing the victim into unwanted sexual activity, degrading the victim sexually, not using protection to prevent STD transmission or pregnancy or even forcing the victim to have sex with other people outside of the relationship.

Why don’t these victims just leave? They don’t have to put up with this!

Domestic violence is a very complex issue, and there are rarely ‘textbook’ cases. Some abusers are members of the victims birth family, and have been abusing them for their whole lives, isolating them and keeping them away from functional family members who might recognise that there is a problem. Some abusers use the victim’s children as living hostages to ensure that their parent won’t risk harm coming to them. Some victims have no money, no access to transport and do not speak English. They may have been told that the world outside their walls is more dangerous than the world within. Some victims have a disability that makes it hard for them to communicate. Some victims live in remote areas and no one knows they are there at all.

The most compelling reason that victims of domestic violence don’t leave is that they do not see how they can.

Domestic Violence in Australia

According to the Australian Bureau of Statistics, 1 in 5 women and 1 in 20 men have experienced violence at the hands of an intimate partner.

Domestic violence is prevalent in Australian society, with hundreds of thousands of families affected. Domestic violence incudes a wide range of abusive behaviour and can be found across a wide range of Australian society.

What should you do?

In a family law matter, the Court can make orders restraining one or both parties from engaging in certain conduct. A restraining order is usually intended to protect people or property, or it might be to force one person to vacate the parties’ former home.

The Court takes the issue of family violence very seriously and that is often a factor in making a restraining order. The Court also takes the breach of restraining orders seriously, and it has the power to impose a range of significant penalties.

If you or someone you know wants more information or needs help or advice, please contact us on 07 3281 6644 or email mail@powerlegal.com.au.

Social media and family law – Just don’t do it!

Social media and family law – Just don’t do it!

Social media – Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, Snapchat and the like – can be a lot of fun and have become an accepted part of modern life.  Many of us use such forms of electronic communication to share the exciting, as well as the banal events in our lives, to express our views and to stay in touch with loved ones.  But what happens when people going through a relationship breakdown take to social media?  Usually little good comes of it, and sometimes quite a lot of bad can result.

Social media as evidence

If you are going through a separation, you should expect your former partner, their lawyer or the children’s lawyer to search social media to see if they can find out anything damaging about you that could be used as evidence. For example, if you are involved in a financial dispute and might be claiming that you cannot afford to pay spouse maintenance or increased child support, it would probably not be a good idea to share on Instagram photos of your latest holiday or new car.

Similarly, when involved in a parenting dispute, you would be wise not to post to Facebook about your latest “big night out”, especially if the children were in your care at that time.

When making a decision about where children are to live and with whom they are to spend time, the Court can take into account the ability of the parents to communicate and cooperate with one another.  So, it is not likely to be helpful if the Court is shown evidence of abusive or derogatory posts you have made on social media about your former partner.

Of course, many people have social media privacy settings which limit the information that can be seen by non-“friends”. If you haven’t set your social media privacy in that way, you would be wise to do that while you’re sorting out the issues arising from your relationship breakdown. However, even with tight privacy settings, it’s still better to be very careful about what you post, or just don’t do it at all.

Social media and prosecution

The law prohibits the publication, including by electronic means, of information relating to family law proceedings which identifies the parties involved, people associated with those parties or any witnesses. Anyone who breaches that rule is guilty of an offence, the maximum penalty for which is 12 months imprisonment.

That prohibition has not prevented some people involved in family law proceedings from using social media as a weapon against their former partner, by carrying out a campaign of cyber-bullying against their former partner, his or her lawyers, the children’s lawyers and the judicial officers involved in the case.

In two recent cases involving such unlawful social media publication, the Court focused primarily on two things.

Firstly, the Court invoked its child protection jurisdiction and concerned itself with the harm that might befall the children if, as a result of social media publication of information relating to family law proceedings, members of the public could identify the children involved, such that the children might then be exposed to ridicule, curiosity or notoriety.

Secondly, the Court considers it in the public interest to preserve public perception of the integrity and impartiality of the Courts and judicial system, which some litigants have used social media to attack.

In both cases, the Judges commented on the difference between unlawful publication of information about family law proceedings in a one off newspaper article, for example, and publication on the internet, which is and remains available for quick and easy access by anyone, anywhere, at any time.

In one of those cases the offending parent was ordered to remove all references to the parties and the proceedings from the website he or his family had set up to cyber-bully the mother and to expose the lawyers and judges involved in the case as “corrupt”. In addition, the Court ordered the Federal Police to investigate whether the father had committed an indictable offence.

Similar orders were made in the other case in which the offending party, again the father, had used Facebook to denigrate the mother and her lawyers, the Court, the Department of Community Services and the children’s lawyer.

Can social media be good?

The cases referred to above involved ongoing bitterness and acrimony between the separated couple. Happily, that isn’t always the case, and some separating parents can respectfully communicate and cooperate with each other for the benefit of their children. In such a situation, tech savvy parents may find a way to use electronic communication or social media to their mutual advantage, for example privately sharing necessary information about the children and their activities.

Conclusion

Unless you and your former partner can find a way to privately use electronic communication to help you co-parent your children after separation, the general guideline when it comes to social media and family law disputes is just don’t do it.

Not only would you not want to find your Facebook posts being used as evidence against you in court proceedings, you could even expose yourself to prosecution by the Federal Police for breaching the law against publication of information relating to family law proceedings.

If you or someone you know wants more information or needs help or advice, please contact us on 07 3281 6644 or email mail@powerlegal.com.au.

Do you know when to update your Will?

Do you know when to update your Will?

Most people are aware that a valid Will determines how their assets are dealt with after they are gone. Wills generally provide for the appointment of a trusted executor/s and gifts to chosen beneficiaries. They may also appoint guardians for minor children and give direction for specific funeral and burial arrangements.

When to review your Will

Many people make a Will, arrange for it to be safely stored and then forget about it. However, in many situations reviewing your Will is just as important as preparing it, particularly when events occur and your Will no longer reflects your wishes.

Your Will should be reviewed when your personal or financial circumstances change.

The following events might prompt you to review your Will.

Marriage

Generally, the Succession Act 1981 (Qld) revokes a Will upon the marriage of the testator but not provisions of gifts to the testator’s spouse at the time of the testator’s death nor the appointment of that person as executor, trustee or guardian. Similar provisions apply upon the registration of a relationship.

A Will made in contemplation of marriage is not revoked when the marriage takes effect.

If you have married since preparing your Will you should have it reviewed to determine whether it still reflects your wishes. Even if the Will was made in contemplation of marriage to your present spouse, if some time has passed since preparing it, certain other terms of the Will may no longer be desired.

Be aware also that older Wills may fall under previous provisions of legislation and have different effects. As a general rule, Wills older than three years should be reviewed.

Separation

The divorce of a testator revokes a Will to the extent of gifts to the testator’s former spouse, the appointment of the former spouse as executor, trustee or guardian and the grant to the former spouse of a power of appointment. The divorce however does not affect the appointment of a former spouse as trustee of property held for the children of the testator and spouse.

Changes in marital status or relationships should always prompt you to review your Will.

As a divorce will result in some provisions remaining valid and some not, your Will should always be reviewed to take into account your new circumstances.

Note also that many partners are separated for some time before finalising a divorce so your Will should be reviewed once you determine that you and your spouse have separated indefinitely.

Birth of a child

Obviously the birth of a child will warrant revision of your Will to ensure that child is adequately provided for. Your Will can be drafted to distribute assets equally amongst your children, even those born after your Will is made.

Death or ill health of an executor

You may have appointed an executor/trustee of your estate who is no longer alive, aging, mentally or physically unwell, or who has moved away. In these circumstances you might consider appointing a new executor. Your Will can provide for a substitute executor if your appointed executor is unable or unwilling to act. There is no limit to the number of executors you may appoint. Your executors should be capable of administering your estate in accordance with your wishes, which is often carried out under the guidance of a solicitor.

Death of a beneficiary

A gift to a beneficiary who dies before, or within 30 days of the testator, may fail unless a contrary intention is stated in the Will.

If the beneficiary was a child of the deceased then the Succession Act 1981 (Qld) provides that the deceased child’s children will instead take the gift. If the testator has no children and a substitute beneficiary is not nominated the gift falls to the residuary estate. This can have unintended effects.

A Will that nominates a beneficiary who has passed on should be reviewed to ensure that it still has the desired effect.

Disposal of a specific gift

A specific gift is clearly identified and separate to other property of the estate; such as a prestige motor vehicle. If you sell or dispose of such an asset after you make your Will then the gift fails.

The result is that the intended recipient of the gift may receive nothing at all or a much lesser share of the estate than what you intended. This may have a significant effect, particularly if the asset is of substantial value.

Acquisition of interests in a company or partnership

Property owned by a company cannot generally be disposed of by Will however the shares in a company may be gifted. If you acquire an interest in a partnership you should consider what happens to that interest when you die. Most partnership agreements set out what happens when one partner dies and how that partner’s share of the partnership is distributed. New business interests should always prompt reviewing your Will.

Increased wealth, potential challenges to a Will, vulnerable beneficiaries

Your Will may incorporate a testamentary trust to provide for minors, protect beneficiaries under legal incapacity, safeguard beneficiaries’ assets from creditors or family provision claims and provide certain income tax advantages.

If you would like these protective measures incorporated in your estate planning and the value of your assets warrant the administrative and accounting costs of a testamentary trust then it is worthwhile discussing this option with your solicitor.

Summary

Life is unpredictable and change inevitable. For better or worse life changes are likely to impact upon your estate planning. For good measure, you could diarise to review your Will each time your tax return is prepared. Remember that your superannuation, binding death benefit nominations, appointments of power of attorney and enduring guardians also form part of effective life and estate planning. These should also be regularly reviewed.

If you or someone you know wants more information or needs help or advice, please contact us on 07 3281 6644 or email mail@powerlegal.com.au.

Choosing a Business Structure

There are four (4) main types of business structures for doing business in Australia, each with their own advantages and disadvantages. A person can carry on business as a sole trader, partnership, trust and company.

The choice of business structure is an important decision to make at the start of a business venture, as the structure can impact on tax implications and reporting requirements during the lifetime of the business. When setting up a business structure, consideration should be given to factors such as how many people will be involved in the business, what the business will do, how much income is likely to be earned from the business and the intended growth of the business.

Sole Trader

A person can carry on a business on his or her own behalf, as a sole trader. A sole trader can trade under his or her own name or a registered business name. The income earned as a sole trader is taxed at the same rate as individual tax payers.

This is the simplest form of business structure, with lower establishment costs and with minimal legal and compliance requirements. The main disadvantage to this type of business structure is that a sole trader is personally liable for all obligations incurred in the course of the business.

Partnership

Two or more individuals can carry on business in partnership, where the income from the business is received jointly. Partnerships are relatively inexpensive to form and operate. Most partnerships are established by a partnership agreement which sets out the rights and obligations of the partners. A partnership itself is not taxable, rather each partner pays tax on their share of the net income of the partnership.

The downside to this type of business structure is that partners are severally and jointly liable for the obligations of the partnership. There is also potential for dispute and loss of trust between the partners.

Trust

Under a trust, a trustee owns the property or assets of the trust and carries on the business on behalf of the beneficiaries of the trust. A trustee can be an individual or a company. A formal Deed is required to set up a trust and there are annual tasks for a trustee to undertake. As such, it can be expensive and complicated to set up and administer a trust.

The advantages of a trust are that there is flexibility in income distribution and income can be streamed to low income tax beneficiaries to take advantage of their lower marginal tax rate. Furthermore, assets can be protected through a properly drafted Deed. The disadvantages are that trusts can be costly to set up and there are more compliance and legal requirements.

Company

A company is a separate legal entity capable of holding assets in its own name. The words “Pty Ltd” after a business name show that the business is a registered legal entity trading in its own right. A company is owned by shareholders and directors manage the company’s day to day business and affairs. The shareholders of a company receive any company profits in the form of dividends. Shareholders can limit their personal liability and are not generally liable for the company debts. Instead, the financial liability of the company is limited to the company assets.

Companies are governed by the Corporations Law and there are a number of duties and obligations for company directors. Primarily, directors have an obligation to act in the best interests of the company. Establishment of a company and ongoing administrative and compliance costs associated with the Corporations Law can be high. There is also a requirement to publicly disclose key information.

Conclusion

Each business will vary and no business owner’s circumstances will be the same. It is advisable to talk to an accountant or solicitor about the costs and risks of each business structure to make sure that the business structure used is the right one for the business and its needs going forward.

If you or someone you know wants more information or needs help or advice, please contact us on 07 3281 6644 or email mail@powerlegal.com.au.

Immunisation and Family Law

Some Australian parents have recently begun to question whether to immunise their children, expressing concerns about possible side-effects risks associated with childhood vaccinations.  But what happens if parents are separated and can’t agree?

 Background

Childhood vaccines, introduced in 1932, are said to have greatly reduced illness and deaths from diseases such as whooping cough, polio, measles and mumps.  However, in recent years immunisation rates have fallen amid some parents’ fears about the safety of vaccines, whether vaccines have been adequately tested and concerns about vaccines’ links to conditions such as autism, sudden infant death syndrome and multiple sclerosis.

Approximately 92% of Australian 5 year-old are fully immunised; however, in some areas the figure is lower than that.  Some diseases, whooping cough for example, previously thought to be “extinct”, seem to again be on the rise.

The Australian government maintains a register of the vaccinations received by children under 7 years of age.  Parental eligibility for some family payments is now linked to children’s immunisation status, and in some circumstances unimmunised children may not remain at school or daycare if there is an outbreak of a particular disease.  Exemptions can be obtained if there are approved medical reasons why the child is not immunised.

Who gets to decide?

It is hoped that parents would agree on whether or not to vaccinate their children, perhaps after discussing any concerns with their family doctor.  But what if they can’t agree?  Who gets to decide?

Equal parental responsibility

In the absence of a Court order, both parents, whether separated or not, have equal parental responsibility for their children.  In addition, except in unusual situations, the Court normally orders that both separated parents have equal shared parental responsibility.

What is equal shared parental responsibility?

Equal shared parental responsibility means that the parents both have the right to consult with each other, hopefully agree on and then implement decisions about their children’s long-term care, welfare and development.  Those long-term issues include decisions such as a child’s name and religion, schooling and major health decisions.  Major health decisions are things like an operation, treating a broken bone, commencing certain medication such as Ritalin, or arranging for a child to see a psychologist.  Whether or not to vaccinate a child probably also constitutes a major health decision.

In other words, where parents have equal shared parental responsibility, they share the right to be consulted about and hopefully agree on whether or not to vaccinate their children.  Neither parent has the right to make that decision without consulting with and obtaining the other parent’s consent.

What if we cant agree?

For some parents, the immunisation debate can become emotionally charged, as they may approach the decision from different lifestyle, wellness and health care philosophies.  One parent may also be concerned not to lose government benefits if the children are not fully vaccinated.

In such circumstances, no matter how much the parents consult with one another, they may never be able to reach agreement.  In addition, the immunisation debate is quite “black and white” – it would not be easy to reach a compromise or middle ground. The parent who opposes vaccination is not likely to agree for the children to receive half their vaccinations, for example; just as the other parent would probably equally strongly believe that the children should get all, not half, their necessary jabs.

Can we go to Court?

If parents cannot agree about how to exercise their equal shared parental responsibility, they may have to ask the Court to decide for them.  Before going to Court, they must first try to resolve their issue through mediation with a family dispute resolution practitioner.

If the parents still can’t agree, going to Court and asking a Judge to decide may be the only option.  The Court generally prefers not to make these sorts of decisions for parents, but if the parents really cannot reach an agreement, then a Judge would ultimately impose his or her decision about whether or not the children should be vaccinated.

Summary

Although childhood vaccines against a range of diseases have been in use for many decades, in some parts of Australia today there is strenuous debate about the need for and safety of immunisation programs.  This debate could be a source of conflict for separated parents.

In most situations, parents have equal shared parental responsibility, meaning that parents share the right to consult with one another and hopefully agree on issues relating to their children’s long-term welfare, which would include decisions about vaccinating their children.  However, if they cannot agree, the Court can be asked to decide for them.

To find out more about your rights regarding the immunisation of your children, call us on 07 3281 6644 or email mail@powerlegal.com.au.

Can your ex-de facto inherit under your Will?

Once upon a time you were happily living together with your de facto partner. Roses were bought, dinners were cooked, finances were shared and Wills were signed leaving all your assets to the other partner in the event of what you then thought of as the far away time of your tragic passing. Thoughts of either of you dying were such a melancholy distraction from the happiness of your lives together, that you put your Wills away in a bottom drawer and never looked at them again.

Unfortunately, however, there wasn’t a fairytale happily ever after ending to this story. You and your partner decided to take your lives in different directions. Joint bank accounts were closed, furniture and other assets were divided; but all the while, your Wills stayed in the bottom drawer, unread and forgotten. Until one of you died.

What happens now?

Your ex-de facto wants his or her share; your other family members think “They were never married. Why should she/ he be entitled to anything?”. It looks like this might get messy.

Are your other family members right?

Many people think that, because they weren’t married, their ex-de facto has no future financial claim on them or their estate. Some people might also think that if they and their ex-partner have divided up their assets, neither one could have a further financial claim on the other. Unfortunately, those assumptions aren’t always correct.

The laws relating to division of assets after a couple separates are completely distinct from those dealing with Wills and inheritances. A Will is not affected by a family law property settlement, which, of itself, cannot prevent someone receiving a gift left to them in their ex-partner’s Will.

So, can your ex-de facto inherit?

According to a recent Western Australian case, the answer might depend on exactly how you referred to your ex-de facto in your Will.

In Blyth v Wilken the Court considered a situation where, in his Will, the deceased left his assets to his now ex-de facto partner, with the parties having separated some three years before the deceased’s death. Eleven years before his death, and at a time when the couple were living together, the deceased made a Will leaving the bulk of his estate to “my de facto wife Kathrine”. The Will had not been changed after the parties separated.

The Court found that by using the words “my de facto wife Kathrine”, the deceased didn’t merely intend to benefit Kathrine; he intended to benefit Kathrine because she was his de facto wife. Accordingly, the Court found that, notwithstanding what the Will said, the deceased would not have wanted Kathrine to benefit from his estate as she was no longer his de facto wife at the time of his death. The gift to Kathrine, therefore, failed and other family members benefitted from the deceased’s estate.

Would different words have made a difference?

The decision in this case depended on the use of the words “my de facto wife Kathrine” in the deceased’s Will. If the Will had merely referred to Kathrine by name, without also describing her as “my de facto wife”, the outcome could well have been very different. That is, despite separating from the deceased almost three years before he died, Kathrine could have received the bulk of her former de facto partner’s estate.

A word of caution

The case of Blyth v Wilken is only one decision of a single Master (not a Judge). The decision is not binding on the West Australian Supreme Court, nor other Courts, which could come to a different decision on similar facts.

Just because your Will refers to “my de facto partner such and such” that is not necessarily a guarantee that that person will not be able to benefit from your estate in the event that you die after ending your relationship with him or her.

Conclusion

In most Australian States and Territories (NSW, Victoria, South Australia, Western Australia and the Northern Territory), separating from your de facto partner will not change your Will.

Any gift in your Will to your ex-de facto could still be valid, despite the fact that you have separated and divided up your assets. It is possible that, based on the decision in Blyth v Wilken, the Court could overturn a gift in your Will to your former de facto, depending on how that gift was worded.

In the ACT, Tasmania and Queensland, termination of a registered de facto relationship will revoke any gift in your Will to your ex-de facto partner. However, this only applies to registered relationships and registered terminations of them; and in the ACT it only applies to registered same sex relationships.

Regardless of where in Australia you live, the safest course of action is to review, and if necessary change, the terms of your Will as soon as possible after the ending of any relationship, even a friendship.

If, for example, your Will leaves your jewellery to “my friend so and so”, would you still want “so and so” to receive that jewellery if you’ve de-friended each other by the time of your death?

Blyth v Wilken suggests that the jewellery may not end up in your former friend’s hands, but would you want to leave that to chance and to the question of whether a Court would follow the Blyth v Wilken decision?

If you or someone you know wants more information or needs help or advice, please contact us on 07 3281 6644 or email mail@powerlegal.com.au.